Comments on: The Great Ruby Shootout (July 2010) https://programmingzen.com/the-great-ruby-shootout-july-2010/ Meditations on programming, startups, and technology Thu, 06 Nov 2014 21:18:14 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Why JRuby is the best of both worlds | AutomatorWorld https://programmingzen.com/the-great-ruby-shootout-july-2010/#comment-28550 Thu, 06 Nov 2014 21:18:14 +0000 http://programmingzen.com/?p=1233#comment-28550 […]      http://programmingzen.com/2010/07/19/the-great-ruby-shootout-july-2010/ […]

]]> By: kiz https://programmingzen.com/the-great-ruby-shootout-july-2010/#comment-28008 Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:47:25 +0000 http://programmingzen.com/?p=1233#comment-28008 would you please benchmark for 2012 or when mri 2.0 released? ^^ thanks

]]> By: Why I Won’t Be Publishing New ‘Great Ruby Shootouts’ https://programmingzen.com/the-great-ruby-shootout-july-2010/#comment-27840 Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:15:11 +0000 http://programmingzen.com/?p=1233#comment-27840 […] last shootout (over two years ago now) and its predecessors were highly popular posts. In fact, benchmarking in […]

]]> By: Finity https://programmingzen.com/the-great-ruby-shootout-july-2010/#comment-27838 Wed, 10 Oct 2012 19:15:14 +0000 http://programmingzen.com/?p=1233#comment-27838 please kindly do another benchmark for 2012 ^^

thank you very much

]]> By: Cristian M?gheru?an-Stanciu https://programmingzen.com/the-great-ruby-shootout-july-2010/#comment-27607 Thu, 17 May 2012 22:10:46 +0000 http://programmingzen.com/?p=1233#comment-27607 Can you do a new benchmark so we can see the current state?

Thanks!

]]> By: Antonio Cangiano https://programmingzen.com/the-great-ruby-shootout-july-2010/#comment-18482 Fri, 20 Aug 2010 07:41:52 +0000 http://programmingzen.com/?p=1233#comment-18482 In reply to Isaac Gouy.

Yes.

]]> By: Isaac Gouy https://programmingzen.com/the-great-ruby-shootout-july-2010/#comment-18467 Fri, 20 Aug 2010 07:34:56 +0000 http://programmingzen.com/?p=1233#comment-18467 In reply to Antonio Cangiano.

Given the timeouts, I should ask which data made it into the summary – just data from rows which had no timeout or error?

]]> By: Isaac Gouy https://programmingzen.com/the-great-ruby-shootout-july-2010/#comment-18452 Fri, 20 Aug 2010 01:44:38 +0000 http://programmingzen.com/?p=1233#comment-18452 In reply to Antonio Cangiano.

Aren’t you curious to see if that bogus Prime measurement pushed Ruby 1.9.2 ahead of JRuby into first place?

]]> By: Antonio Cangiano https://programmingzen.com/the-great-ruby-shootout-july-2010/#comment-18423 Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:41:28 +0000 http://programmingzen.com/?p=1233#comment-18423 In reply to Isaac Gouy.

As I mention in the post, prime will be excluded from future tests.

]]> By: Isaac Gouy https://programmingzen.com/the-great-ruby-shootout-july-2010/#comment-18422 Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:39:14 +0000 http://programmingzen.com/?p=1233#comment-18422 The Computer Language Benchmarks Game measurements have now been updated for Ruby 1.9.2 and it still seems that JRuby is a little ahead on both x86 and x64 – so why doesn’t it look like that in “The Great Ruby Shootout (July 2010)” ?

Could it really be that “The Great Ruby Shootout (July 2010)” results are that badly broken from the Ruby 1.9.2 Prime benchmarks being rewritten in C ?

Please re-run the statistics with Prime excluded as a sanity check.

]]>