Comments on: Comparing the performance of IronRuby, Ruby 1.8 and Ruby 1.9 on Windows https://programmingzen.com/performance-of-ironruby-ruby-on-windows/ Meditations on programming, startups, and technology Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:52:58 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Guest Post: What’s IronRuby, and how do I put it on Rails? « IUpdateable from Eric Nelson https://programmingzen.com/performance-of-ironruby-ruby-on-windows/#comment-8676 Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:52:58 +0000 http://antoniocangiano.com/?p=908#comment-8676 […] passes about 98%. It also benchmarks considerably (more than 4x) faster than MRI 1.8, as Antonia Cangiano demonstrates with his suite of Ruby […]

]]> By: brianoh https://programmingzen.com/performance-of-ironruby-ruby-on-windows/#comment-8655 Sat, 23 Jan 2010 02:48:16 +0000 http://antoniocangiano.com/?p=908#comment-8655 Thanks for posting the benchmarks Antonio. I think it represents a genuine intention to be unbiased, but a follow up if you have the time and inclination would be good at some point (or have you already?).

]]> By: Antonio Cangiano https://programmingzen.com/performance-of-ironruby-ruby-on-windows/#comment-6929 Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:12:30 +0000 http://antoniocangiano.com/?p=908#comment-6929 Charles, I remember reading your insightful comment on RubyLearning, but somehow I didn’t think about the preview release. Thanks for your help on the forum, btw.

]]> By: Charles Roper https://programmingzen.com/performance-of-ironruby-ruby-on-windows/#comment-6928 Tue, 04 Aug 2009 09:14:33 +0000 http://antoniocangiano.com/?p=908#comment-6928 Antonio, I explicitly mentioned the preview release of the new RubyInstaller in a thread on the book promotion you were running over on RubyLearning… I guess you must have missed that message!

]]> By: A faster Ruby on Windows is possible (benchmarks for 4 implementations inside) | Zen and the Art of Programming https://programmingzen.com/performance-of-ironruby-ruby-on-windows/#comment-6925 Tue, 04 Aug 2009 06:07:49 +0000 http://antoniocangiano.com/?p=908#comment-6925 […] Comparing the performance of IronRuby, Ruby 1.8 and Ruby 1.9 on Windows […]

]]> By: IronRuby Testing and development » Blog Archive » IronRuby 0.9 Perf gains https://programmingzen.com/performance-of-ironruby-ruby-on-windows/#comment-6921 Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:44:00 +0000 http://antoniocangiano.com/?p=908#comment-6921 […] Cangiano has reported on the state of IronRuby on Windows, where IronRuby is showing the fruits of Tomas’ labor: […]

]]> By: Antonio Cangiano https://programmingzen.com/performance-of-ironruby-ruby-on-windows/#comment-6918 Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:25:44 +0000 http://antoniocangiano.com/?p=908#comment-6918 @Luis: Your comment was caught by the anti-spam due to the presence of numerous links. However, I promptly approved it as soon as I saw your second comment mentioning the issue.

]]> By: Antonio Cangiano https://programmingzen.com/performance-of-ironruby-ruby-on-windows/#comment-6917 Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:18:42 +0000 http://antoniocangiano.com/?p=908#comment-6917 @Paolo: They aim to support 1.8.x. At this stage it should be 1.8.6.

]]> By: Luis Lavena https://programmingzen.com/performance-of-ironruby-ruby-on-windows/#comment-6916 Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:10:04 +0000 http://antoniocangiano.com/?p=908#comment-6916 At Paolo: Commented about this but my post get moderated (which is weird since the first one wasn’t).

If Antonio approves it you will find answers to your concerns.

]]> By: Ian Dees https://programmingzen.com/performance-of-ironruby-ruby-on-windows/#comment-6915 Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:57:39 +0000 http://antoniocangiano.com/?p=908#comment-6915 This is not hard to do by any means, but how many people will? Trust me, relatively few.

Especially when the quirks of individual systems and download mirrors get in the way of this process. There are so many things that can go wrong (and have gone wrong, in my tests) that are beyond the control of the one-click maintainers.

]]>