<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Give Ruby.NET 0.9 some love	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://programmingzen.com/give-rubynet-09-some-love/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://programmingzen.com/give-rubynet-09-some-love/</link>
	<description>Meditations on programming, startups, and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:03:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: The Great Ruby Shootout &#124; Zen and the Art of Ruby Programming		</title>
		<link>https://programmingzen.com/give-rubynet-09-some-love/#comment-1563</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Great Ruby Shootout &#124; Zen and the Art of Ruby Programming]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antoniocangiano.com/2007/11/23/give-rubynet-09-some-love/#comment-1563</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] As mentioned above, Ruby.NET with Mono on Linux was unusable. However, on Windows, performances were decent and improved since last time (even though the hardware for Windows was different so we can&#8217;t scientifically compare them). .NET and Mono are not inherently slow, therefore with the right amount of optimization, I feel that we can improve those numbers. As I said before, let&#8217;s give Ruby.NET some love. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] As mentioned above, Ruby.NET with Mono on Linux was unusable. However, on Windows, performances were decent and improved since last time (even though the hardware for Windows was different so we can&#8217;t scientifically compare them). .NET and Mono are not inherently slow, therefore with the right amount of optimization, I feel that we can improve those numbers. As I said before, let&#8217;s give Ruby.NET some love. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott		</title>
		<link>https://programmingzen.com/give-rubynet-09-some-love/#comment-1444</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antoniocangiano.com/2007/11/23/give-rubynet-09-some-love/#comment-1444</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oh.  My.  God.  How have I not heard about this project?  It doesn&#039;t seem like something that would fly under the radar very well for long.  I&#039;m about to take a job working mainly in C#.net (a language which I&#039;ve learned in order to take the job) for a large company that was interested in me mainly due to my Ruby knowledge.  I just finished reading your post and haven&#039;t had a chance to download Ruby.NET and play with it (I&#039;ll have the rest of the night for that), but I&#039;m already extremely excited.  I had looked at IronRuby, but it seemed to be in very early development.  If Ruby.NET is stable, it could REALLY provide a huge bridge for me to bring Ruby into my new company&#039;s existing .NET infrastructure.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh.  My.  God.  How have I not heard about this project?  It doesn&#8217;t seem like something that would fly under the radar very well for long.  I&#8217;m about to take a job working mainly in C#.net (a language which I&#8217;ve learned in order to take the job) for a large company that was interested in me mainly due to my Ruby knowledge.  I just finished reading your post and haven&#8217;t had a chance to download Ruby.NET and play with it (I&#8217;ll have the rest of the night for that), but I&#8217;m already extremely excited.  I had looked at IronRuby, but it seemed to be in very early development.  If Ruby.NET is stable, it could REALLY provide a huge bridge for me to bring Ruby into my new company&#8217;s existing .NET infrastructure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
