Comments on: Holy Shmoly, Ruby 1.9 smokes Python away!

By: Rohan Jain

Rohan Jain — Thu, 12 Apr 2012 05:56:38 +0000

On my debian sid:

Ruby 1.8.7: 32.65s
Ruby 1.9.3: 5.85s
Python 2.7.3: 11.06s
Python 3.2: 11.89s
Haskell (no opt): 62.57s
Haskell (Compiled): 3.58s

So ruby 1.9 *is* fast.

By: michael

michael — Wed, 28 Dec 2011 06:32:07 +0000

Python on PyPy did this in 4.074s and in 17 secs on the same machine. Ruby did it in 10.5.

I’m happy to see Ruby getting some much needed optimization.

By: peddro vallle

peddro vallle — Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:08:01 +0000

With jruby experiencing a speed up of about 200% thanks to invokedynamic in java 7.02 is time to rewrite the comparison.

http://blog.jruby.org/2011/12getting_started_with_jruby_and_java_7/

also in Hacker News:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3372816

By: roger

roger — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:26:41 +0000

for me (windows)
ruby 1.9.1

16.2s

python 2.6
25s

ruby crystalized [1]
4.8s
Enjoy.
-r
[1] http://github.com/rdp/crystalizer

By: Jorrit Posthuma

Jorrit Posthuma — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:32:43 +0000

Btw, that means 0.586306 seconds, what is more than 20 times faster than Ruby 1.9!

By: Jorrit Posthuma

Jorrit Posthuma — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:29:57 +0000

A honest Haskel comparison (same algoritm), but it can be a lot faster (as shown by Twey).

fib :: Int -> Int
fib i | (i == 0) || (i == 1) = i
| otherwise = fib (i-1) + fib (i-2)

fibSeq :: [(Int, Int)]
fibSeq = [ (i, fib i) | i <- [0..36]]

Slim:Desktop jorrit$ ./fib
[(0,0),(1,1),(2,1),(3,2),(4,3),(5,5),(6,8),(7,13),(8,21),(9,34),(10,55),(11,89),(12,144),(13,233),(14,377),(15,610),(16,987),(17,1597),(18,2584),(19,4181),(20,6765),(21,10946),(22,17711),(23,28657),(24,46368),(25,75025),(26,121393),(27,196418),(28,317811),(29,514229),(30,832040),(31,1346269),(32,2178309),(33,3524578),(34,5702887),(35,9227465),(36,14930352)]
0.586306

By: Real World

Real World — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 02:33:54 +0000

I develop to get paid.

By: Diego Viola

Diego Viola — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 07:42:52 +0000

lol ruby 1.9 kicks python ass.

[root@diego ~]# time ruby test.rb
n=0 => 0
n=1 => 1
n=2 => 1
…
n=34 => 5702887
n=35 => 9227465

real 0m15.056s
user 0m14.868s
sys 0m0.086s
[root@diego ~]# time python test.py
n=0 => 0
n=1 => 1
n=2 => 1
…
n=34 => 5702887
n=35 => 9227465

real 0m42.697s
user 0m42.107s
sys 0m0.165s
[root@diego ~]#

By: Eric

Eric — Thu, 28 May 2009 13:48:34 +0000

Python 2.6.2 is faster and really faster with psyco:

On a Intel Core i7 940 (2.9 Ghz) :

16s for python 2.6.2 without psyco
0.9s with psyco !!!!!

By: Mark

Mark — Sat, 16 May 2009 19:28:28 +0000

@Vadim,

Multi-processor is the key, but there are many many implementations of stuff that will just lead you down an ultimately blind alley.

For one, I wouldn’t touch anything that furthers Microsoft’s interests.

I develop for my clients, not for sick greed.